Marketing, Oh, mixed feelings! I can tell you that I really look forward to the new super bowl ads (some are pure marketing genius) but I really dislike all of the confusion that marketing tends to create in the technology world. Today we are going to attempt to cut through all of the marketing talk and clearly articulate the differences between APM (Application Performance Management) and aaNPM (Application Aware Network Performance Management). I’m not going to try to convince you that you need one instead of the other. This isn’t a sales pitch, it’s an education session.
Let’s start with some Definitions
APM – Gartner has been hard at work trying to clearly define the APM space. According to Gartner, APM tools should contain the following 5 dimensions:
- End-user experience monitoring (EUM) – (How is the application performing according to what the end user sees)
- Runtime application architecture discovery modeling and display (A view of the logical application flow at any given point in time)
- User-defined transaction profiling (Tracking user activity across the entire application)
- Component deep-dive monitoring in application context (Application code execution, sql query execution, message queue behavior, etc…)
aaNPM – Again, Gartner has created a definition for this market segment which you can read about here.
At AppDynamics, our Application Intelligence Platform helps today’s software-defined businesses proactively monitor, manage and optimize the most complex software environments. All in real time, and all in production. With cloud and on-premise deployment flexibility, AppDynamics works and partners with many of the world’s most innovative companies. Customers include Citrix, DIRECTV, Edmunds, Expedia, Fox News, John Deere, OpenTable, Salesforce.com, Sephora, StubHub and Union Pacific Railroad.
“These solutions allow passive packet capture of network traffic and must include the following features, in addition to packet capture technology:
- Receive and process one or more of these flow-based data sources: NetFlow, sFlow and Internet Protocol Flow Information Export (IPFIX).
- Provide roll-ups and dashboards of collected data into business-relevant views, consisting of application-centric performance displays.
- Monitor performance in an always-on state, and generate alarms based on manual or automatically generated thresholds.
- Offer protocol analysis capabilities to decode and understand multiple applications, including voice, video, HTTP and database protocols. The tool must provide end-user experience information for these applications.
- Have the ability to decrypt encrypted traffic if the proper keys are provided to the solution.”
Reality – So what do these definitions mean in real life?
APM tools are typically used by application support, operations, and development teams to rapidly identify, isolate, and repair application issues. These teams usually have a high level understanding of how networks operate but not nearly the detailed knowledge required to resolve network related issues. They live and breathe application code, integration points, and component (server, OS, VM, JVM, etc…) metrics. They call in the network team when they think there is a network issue (hopefully based upon some high level network indicators). These teams usually have no control over the network and must follow the network teams process to get a physical device connected to the network. APM tools do not help you solve network problems.
aaNPM tools are network packet sniffers by definition. The majority of these tools (NetScout, Cisco, Fluke Networks, Network Instruments, etc.) are hardware appliances that you connect to your network. They need to be connected to each segment of the network where you want to collect packets or they must be fed filtered and aggregated packet streams by NPB (Network Packet Broker) devices. aaNPM tools contain a wealth of network level details in addition to some valuable application data (EUM metrics, transaction details, and application flows). aaNPM tools help network engineers solve network problems that are manifesting themselves as application problems. aaNPM tools are not capable of solving code issues as they have no visibility into application code.
If I were on a network support team I would want to understand if applications were being impacted by network issues so I could prioritize re-mediation properly and have a point of reference if I was called out by an application support team.
Network and Application Team Convergence – I’ve been asked if I see network and application teams converging in a similar way that dev and ops teams are converging as a result of the DevOps movement. I have not seen this with any of the companies I get to interact with. Based on my experience working in operations at various companies in the past, network teams and application support teams think in very different ways. Is it impossible for these teams to work in unison? No
, but I see it as unlikely over the next few years at least.
Software Defined Networking – But what about SDN (Software Defined Networking)? I think most network engineers see SDN as a threat to their livelihood whether that is true or not. No matter the case, SDN will take a long time to make it’s way into operational use and in the mean time network and application teams will remain separate.
I hope this was helpful in cutting through the marketing spin that many vendors are using to expand their reach. When it comes right down to it, your use case may require APM, aaNPM, a combination of both, or some other technology not discussed today. Technology is made to solve problems. I highly recommend starting out by defining your problems and then exploring the best solutions available to help solve your problem.